Creating the VIRTUAL Workshop
Needs Assessment,
Support, and Budget:
Many adjunct faculty members cannot attend a face-to-face
workshop due to other commitments on their time, or their location (many live
out of town and teach only online). Access
is a strategic goal of the Provost and so it was charged by her office to
provide workshops and training opportunities to all adjuncts both face-to-face and virtually.
It was determined that additional fiscal resources were not
necessary, but human resources were. To
that end, other Vice Presidents had to agree to allocate human resources to
this project. The project is determined
to begin in January with a launch date of summer 2014 in time for the new
hiring swell for fall classes. The
President supports the project. Here is
a sample of a planning tool, or flow chart for this initiative:
Training
Objectives
At the conclusion of this online orientation the newly hired
adjunct faculty member will be able to:
1.
Sign onto the computer and utilize the College’s intranet, email
system, ANGEL, and WebAccess to navigate the colleges systems, policies, and
procedures.
2.
Operate the technology equipment in the classroom.
3.
Respond to students in need of accommodations, students in
distress, and classroom management issues.
4.
Apply acquired knowledge of the subject by predicting responses to
scenarios typical of the college.
5.
Address emergency situations appropriately.
Planning Process Steps:
Step One (this step is
complete): Outline of the Virtual
Adjunct Orientation Workshop
An outline of the workshop needs to be determined. Using the face-to-face workshop as a guide the
elements of the training should include the same training activities (see blog
portion “Completed One-hour Workshop”).
In order to deliver the same experience only virtually the following modifications would need to be made:
·
Instead of the face-to-face instruction in the computer lab to
accomplish Training Objective 1, a self-directed interactive guide to logging
onto the email and the other online resources at the college would need to be
constructed. After the participant
successfully logs on, they could explore the various areas of the intranet.
One
idea would be to have a scavenger hunt that takes them to the areas otherwise
demonstrated by the Academic Technologist during the lab portion of the
face-to-face workshop. There would be no
time limit for this portion, as the participant should explore as long as
he/she wishes.
·
Instead of the face-to-face faculty and administration lecture/discussion/demonstration
portion, the participants should be able to achieve Training Objectives 2 – 5
in various virtual ways leading us to our next step.
Step Two (estimate 1 month to
complete): Deciding
Appropriate Virtual Formats
Meet with the Academic Technologist to
decide which appropriate virtual formats would best fulfill the training objectives
outlined above. Some of the elements that need further discussion and/or
determination are:
a. How to facilitate an online Q&A
session
b. How to facilitate a discussion of typical
classroom scenarios.
c. Creating videos or “talking head” pods
(such as a meet the faculty video).
d. Which portions of the orientation should be
delivered as lectures.
e. How to demonstrate use of typical classroom
technology equipment?
e. Should we/how do we create interactive tests?
f. How to
create a feedback form for evaluation
There are many types of formats the college uses to create
presentations such as Power Point, Prezi, Snagit, and Camtasia. Additionally,
there are video formats that can be used. A game might be included such
as Jeopardy instead of a “test”. The workshop can be full of “bells and
whistles” or just an enhanced power point. I have a head start because I
can use my Power Point presentation as a base and I included a text version in
the notes section that can be used as the script for closed captioning.
The student scenarios were assessed as one of the most
helpful parts of the face2face workshop. Even though the faculty video
was not popular in the face-to-face workshop, it is the only way to include the
faculty in the virtual workshop. We can do one or both
(multiple modes for universal design) of the following:
1. Text
(with optional audio caption) followed by a multiple-choice answer to the “What do you do?” question.
2. Talking head pod (with optional text
caption) followed by multiple-choice answer and explanation from the “head”.
3. One long video with “test” at the
conclusion. If the participant doesn’t score a certain number of
questions correctly, he/she is sent back to the area he/she missed.
Step Three (estimate 1 month): Considering
Universal Design
Next we need to meet with the Instructional Design
and Delivery (IDD) administrators to determine Universal Design Standards. Guaranteeing Universal Design is an important step and one that is
often forgotten. Consider the embarrassment if one of the new faculty
members is deaf or blind and you have not made the necessary accommodations to
the virtual workshop! Our college intranet offers links to other sites
to assist with including universal design in the instructional environment
(face-to-face and virtual). One of the links I found most helpful, and would
use when designing the online version of my workshop, was University of
Washington Do-IT: http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Academics/equal_access_tlc.html
While looking around on this website, I “linked” to another
one that is also packed with resources. I found two to be most helpful.
http://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility gives examples of how to make
your web-based module accessible to all. Some of the examples listed that
we will employ are:
- Use alternate text for images
- Include transcripts of podcasts and/or
videos
- Keep the web content simple and not to
“busy”
“The Web is fundamentally designed to work for
all people, whatever their hardware, software, language, culture, location, or
physical or mental ability. When the Web meets this goal, it is accessible to
people with a diverse range of hearing, movement, sight, and cognitive ability.” (World Wide Web Consortium, 2011).
http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Technology/distance.learn.html explains the types of “access
barriers” to different types of instruction that a person with disabilities
might encounter. Burgstahler (2012) discusses accommodation approaches to
each area of instruction.
“Today,
the lines are blurred between different types of distance learning courses as
multiple modes of delivery are employed in a single course. For example, a
class "library" could be a website; class discussions could take
place using email; some course content could be delivered using printed
materials and television; and the final activity could be a place-bound
proctored exam.” (Burgstahler,
2012)
An example of universal design in a podcast/video is
demonstrated on this YouTube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3sdR53ho2g&feature=youtu.be
Notice you can click on “cc” and
the video includes closed captioning.
Step Four (estimate 3 months to
complete): Course Design and
Creating the Virtual Components
Once the virtual environment has been decided, and Universal
Design has been considered, a storyboard can be used as an outline to map out
the virtual workshop elements. The Academic Technologist will
assist in creating this useful tool (pictured below) that lays out all the
pieces of the workshop. I am told to think of the pieces as
pictures. After the “pictures” are scrap-booked onto the storyboard, the course design begins to emerge. Universal Design accommodations are also
included on the storyboard.
Finally, we are ready to create each component of the
workshop in each decided virtual delivery mode.
This takes the most time, and is done collaboratively. Once the individual components are created determining
the location of its virtual home, and how we market it to the new adjunct, are
the next steps.
Step Five
(estimate 1 month): Marketing - Where is Home? How is it made available?
To be determined…Questions need to be answered by
our experts in Public Relations. Some of the initial questions I have
thought of are:
· Should the workshop be
accessible to anyone on the internet or available
only internally on the intranet?
· If it is housed on the intranet,
how will the new faculty gain access?
· Can it be given as a link
through ANGEL?
· Could the link be emailed to
personal email?
· Are there any college policies
we need to follow in order to create an online workshop?
Works Cited
Burgstahler, P. S. (2012). Program Practices to Ensure
Access to Students with Disabilities. Retrieved December 1, 2013, from University of Washington
- Real Connections: Making Distance Learning Accessible to Everyone:
http://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Technology/distance.learn.html
World Wide Web Consortium. (2011). Accessibility. Retrieved December 1, 2013,
from W3C: http://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility
Wendy,
ReplyDeleteGreat job fleshing out some of the details and rationale for your virtual class plan. This version reads better, touches on the key program planning areas, and is more professional in its presentation.
The resources that you located on universal design would have been great to share with the others in the class because all of us should be thinking about how to create accessible CPE. Consider bringing this information into the adult learning class.
Jane